Once a crisis befalls
your organization public relations strategists must reactively respond to the
outside accusations and criticisms in order to rebuild trust, support, and
reputation. It should be duly noted that crisis communication, or communicating
with external stakeholders in a crisis, is an attempt to inform quickly to achieve
some sort of objective. Reactive communication strategies should not crisis
resolution, but rather a means to that end. “Response time is a tactical
element of the crisis response, while resolving a crisis is a strategic element”
(Coombs, 2015, p. 133).
There are two important
aspects in responding to a crisis:
1. You
must be quick:
·
A quick response during a crisis
establishes organizational competency, while a slow response tells the
stakeholders that your organization is incapable of handling a crisis. No
response at all demonstrates that your organization is not in control or is not
trying to take control. AVOID using ‘no comment’ as a form of response – it
just makes you look guilty.
·
Another benefit of the quick reactive
response is that it gives you control of the dissemination of information. What
we mean is that if you do not provide some sort of information to the public,
someone else will. “If the crisis team does not supply the initial information…some
other group will, and they may be ill-informed, misinformed, or motivated to
harm the organization in some way” (Coombs, 2015, p. 131). People like to draw
their own conclusions, especially when there is a lack of information. Be quick
to inform to take control of the situation, even if not all of the information
is available at the given time
2. You
must be clear:
·
It almost seems impossible to be quick and
clear; by being clear, we mean that we provide the masses with as much
information that is available. “A crisis team might have to appear before the
media or post information online with an incomplete story. That is OK. There is
no sin in telling the media the crisis team does not know something but will
provide the information as soon as possible” (Coombs, 2015, p. 132). By
establishing an immediate presence you demonstrate that you understand how to
handle the situation. When misinformed claims do arise due to your initial lack
of information, you have already established enough credibility to refute those
claims.
·
Though it’s better to say that your
organization does not have all of the information available at the time, make
sure you promise that you will provide that information as soon as possible –
then follow through with that promise. According to Coombs (2015) if
information is promised, it had better be delivered in some way, otherwise you
jeopardize the organization/stakeholder trust by losing credibility. If there
is information, deliver it as soon as possible. Remember, by being quick to
react, you are rewarded with a degree of control.

No comments:
Post a Comment